Learn more about Traktor 2.6.1 here or more about Ibrahim’s Key Finder over here. That being said, Traktor’s key detection does seem hold up pretty well against the competition in this initial results! Additionally, the comparison is just results out of 100 songs, which doesn’t make it the ultimate answer to which is best. the competitionįull disclosure: Ibrahim (forum username ibsh) actually is the developer behind Key Finder, the free open source app that’s the winner in the chart above. Higher number of exact matches than MIK and solid overall accuracy (…) Slightly fewer than MIK.” – ibsh Traktor's Key Detection vs. ![]() Based on some very basic research, it’s a good algorithm, too. ![]() Most users aren’t looking for this level of analysis but for a completely free software, it’s probably the best value of any of the. “Now Traktor has a key detection feature, it seems sneaked it into the latest point release. The Tile Pro key finder is a top pick for tracking keys and other important items over a larger home or office space. Interestingly, the software is capable of doing a detailed analysis that displays a chromagram of the notes in a track and assigns a primary key for different sections of a track (see image above). We’ve gotten a barrage of comments, tweets, and emails this afternoon asking us how well the new Traktor key detection algorithm works – and before we’ve even gotten a chance to give it a whirl, one of our forum members ibsh has jumped on the question and made the below quick graph comparing it to Rapid Evolution, Mixed In Key 4, Mixed In Key 5, and Key Finder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |